In a recent interview with Maria Bartiromo on Fox Business, Representative Jim Jordan shed light on the challenges facing President Trump’s America First agenda in federal courts. As a staunch supporter of the President and his policies, Jordan highlighted the impact of radical judges on the administration’s efforts to put America first.
The conversation began with Bartiromo asking Jordan about the recent ruling by a federal judge in California, which blocked the Trump administration’s policy of withholding federal funds from sanctuary cities. Jordan expressed his disappointment with the decision, stating that it was a clear example of a radical judge overstepping their authority and interfering with the President’s agenda.
Jordan went on to explain that this interference by radical judges is not limited to just one case, but has become a pattern in the federal courts. He cited the numerous injunctions issued against the administration’s travel ban, which was ultimately upheld by the Supreme Court, as well as the ongoing legal battles over the border wall and the census citizenship question.
The Congressman also pointed out the danger of these radical judges using their personal political beliefs to make decisions, rather than following the law. He emphasized that the role of a judge is to interpret the law, not to create it, and that these activist judges are hindering the President’s ability to fulfill his promises to the American people.
Bartiromo then asked Jordan about the impact of these radical judges on the America First agenda. Jordan responded by saying that it has become a major challenge for the administration, as they are constantly facing legal roadblocks in their efforts to put America first. He also noted that these judges are not only hindering the President’s agenda, but also disregarding the will of the American people who elected him.
Jordan also addressed the issue of judicial nominations, stating that the President has been making excellent choices for the federal courts, but they are facing obstruction from the Democrats in the Senate. He urged his colleagues to put aside their political differences and confirm these highly qualified nominees, who will uphold the Constitution and support the America First agenda.
The conversation then turned to the upcoming 2020 election and the importance of the courts in shaping the future of the country. Jordan stressed the need for the American people to understand the significance of judicial nominations and to vote for candidates who will support the President’s agenda and appoint constitutional judges.
In conclusion, Representative Jim Jordan’s interview with Maria Bartiromo shed light on the challenges facing President Trump’s America First agenda in federal courts. He highlighted the danger of radical judges using their personal beliefs to interfere with the administration’s policies and urged for the confirmation of constitutional judges. As the 2020 election approaches, it is crucial for the American people to understand the impact of judicial nominations and vote for candidates who will support the President’s agenda and uphold the Constitution.
