DC Superior Court Judge Kendra Briggs, a Biden appointee, has made a controversial decision to release two of the ‘teens’ who viciously attacked former DOGE member Edward Coristine, also known as “Big Balls”. This decision has sparked outrage and disbelief among the public, especially considering the severity of the attack and the heroism displayed by Coristine.
Earlier this month, 19-year-old Edward Coristine was walking with his significant other in Washington D.C. when they were suddenly ambushed by a group of teenagers. The attackers were armed with weapons and were intent on causing harm to the couple. In a brave act of selflessness, Coristine jumped into action to protect his partner and ended up sustaining severe injuries in the process.
Despite the violent nature of the attack and the clear evidence against the perpetrators, Judge Kendra Briggs has ordered the release of two of the attackers. This decision has left many questioning the judge’s judgement and motives, especially since she was appointed by President Joe Biden.
The incident has gained widespread attention and sparked a debate about the justice system and its handling of violent crimes. Many are questioning the message this decision sends to the public, especially to the youth who committed the crime. It raises concerns about the accountability and consequences for such heinous acts.
The Gateway Pundit, a conservative news outlet, was quick to report on the incident with a headline that reads, “JUST IN: Biden-Appointed Judge Orders Release of ‘Teens’ Who Violently Attacked Ex-DOGE Employee Edward Coristine, AKA “Big Balls”. The article goes on to criticize Judge Briggs’ decision and question her qualifications for the role.
However, it is important to note that this incident is not a reflection of the Biden administration or its policies. Judge Briggs’ decision is her own and should not be used to discredit the current administration. It is also crucial to remember that judges are bound by the law and must make decisions based on evidence and legal precedents, not personal beliefs or political affiliations.
That being said, the release of the attackers has caused outrage and disappointment among the public, especially among those who have followed Coristine’s story. The 19-year-old has shown immense bravery and selflessness in protecting his significant other, and it is disheartening to see that justice has not been served in this case.
The decision to release the attackers also raises concerns about the safety of the community. If violent crimes like this are not met with appropriate consequences, it could embolden others to commit similar acts. It is the responsibility of the justice system to ensure that the public feels safe and protected, and this decision has failed to do so.
In conclusion, the release of the ‘teens’ who attacked Edward Coristine, AKA “Big Balls”, has caused shock and disappointment among the public. Judge Kendra Briggs’ decision has raised questions about the justice system and its handling of violent crimes. It is important for the authorities to address these concerns and ensure that justice is served in this case. Our thoughts and support are with Edward Coristine and his loved ones during this difficult time. We hope that he receives the justice he deserves and that this incident serves as a reminder to the youth about the consequences of their actions.
